This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: About testing other languages: was RE: [C++ PATCH, committed] Fix libstdc++ regressions due to my access checking changes


Rainer Orth writes:
 > Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
 > 
 > > I'm aware of that one, however a recent posting indicates that without
 > > the closure interface it is impossible to use a large bit of the API.
 > > 
 > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-02/msg00561.html
 > > 
 > > OTOH, one seems to be able to get testsuite results for the library
 > > with the line length fix.  So I withdraw my comment about testing on
 > > irix6.
 > 
 > Indeed, to the untrained eye testsuite results look somewhat reasonable:
 > 
 >                 === libjava Summary for unix ===
 > 
 > # of expected passes            2316
 > # of unexpected failures        20
 > # of expected failures          16
 > # of untested testcases         111
 > 
 > Unfortunately, there seems to be no up-to-date documentation on what the
 > missing bits are.

This trained eye wants to know what the failures are.

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]