This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] handle CONST_DECL in the gimplifier

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Pop Sébastian <pop at gauvain dot u-strasbg dot fr>
Cc: dnovillo at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 15:47:57 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] handle CONST_DECL in the gimplifier
References: <20030511153606.GA14208@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr><wvl65ohxygs.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com><20030511194010.GA19733@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr>

On Sun, 11 May 2003 21:40:10 +0200, Pop Sébastian <pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> wrote:

> On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 12:03:15PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> A CONST_DECL should be replaced with its DECL_INITIAL.

> Do you mean that this transformation has to be performed by the gimplifier, 
> or should it go before that?  

Both.  I don't see any reason why a CONST_DECL should make it as far as
the gimplifier, but if it does we should deal with it.

> The following solves the bug, however it is not yet bootstrapped.

This is OK, assuming it bootstraps.

Thanks,
Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] handle CONST_DECL in the gimplifier
  - From: Pop Sébastian

References:
- [tree-ssa] handle CONST_DECL in the gimplifier
  - From: Pop Sébastian
- Re: [tree-ssa] handle CONST_DECL in the gimplifier
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [tree-ssa] handle CONST_DECL in the gimplifier
  - From: Pop Sébastian

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]