This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bit extract adjust_address versus scheduler

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jim Wilson <wilson at tuliptree dot org>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 20:18:11 -0700
Subject: Re: bit extract adjust_address versus scheduler
References: <orissv56wp.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <3EB1AB99.4010104@tuliptree.org>

On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 07:19:53PM -0400, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Why is the existing code in mips.md that sets MEM_SIZE not working?

#define MEM_SIZE(RTX)                                                   \
(MEM_ATTRS (RTX) != 0 ? MEM_ATTRS (RTX)->size                           \
 : GET_MODE (RTX) != BLKmode ? GEN_INT (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (RTX))) \
 : 0)

Note that the MEM_ATTRS size is ignored when the memory
doesn't have BLKmode.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bit extract adjust_address versus scheduler
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- bit extract adjust_address versus scheduler
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: bit extract adjust_address versus scheduler
  - From: Jim Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]