This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH: Improve exceptions/inlining compile-time performance


Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com> writes:

> On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 16:17, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > >>>>> Mark Mitchell writes:
> > 
> > Mark> Would you please try rerunning the testsuite with this patch?
> > 
> > Mark> Please try the entire testsuite, not just the affected testcases.
> > 
> > 	I am re-running the entire c++ testsuite for both 3.3 and 3.4.  I
> > already can report that instantiate12.C is not fixed, although deduct5.C
> > no longer produces errors.
> > 
> > 	By the way, the following regressions appeared on the GCC 3.3
> > branch: 
> 
> With the patch I sent you to test, or before that?
> 
> > FAIL: g++.dg/parse/class1.C (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: g++.dg/warn/inline1.C (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: g++.dg/warn/weak1.C (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: g++.other/decl5.C (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: g++.pt/deduct5.C (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: g++.pt/instantiate12.C (test for excess errors)

Before that; you will have gotten mail from the automated regression
tester about it (they appear to be three separate problems from three
different patches, each causing two sets of failures).

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]