This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: reload cse may delete loads it shouldn't
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:03:51 -0700
- Subject: Re: reload cse may delete loads it shouldn't
- References: <ork7dwp2bh.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 05:55:30AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> + different modes. The first element of the list defines the mode in
> + which the register was set; if the mode is unknown or the value is
> + no longer valid in that mode, ELT will be NULL for the first
> + element. */
I'm not that fond of this method of storage. Ideally we'd have
an array of structures and have the mode separate, but I'd be
just as happy with a parallel array of modes instead.
As for the rest of the patch, how does this affect code generation
on non-LOAD_EXTEND_OP targets?
r~