This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Small compiler speedup

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:52:10 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Small compiler speedup
References: <1049836430.19047.106.camel@steven><87adf0u066.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><1049842164.731.156.camel@steven><87vfxousz1.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><1049930803.749.67.camel@steven><8765pnurqo.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><Pine.BSF.4.53.0304110238300.51874@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at> writes:

> On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>>>> #define c_common_stmt_codes \
>> Looks good.  Approved.
>
> As 3.3 still has (serious) performance regressions and this is a
> speed-up, ought this go to the branch as well?

Good idea.  It is quite low risk.

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Small compiler speedup
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [RFC] Small compiler speedup?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [RFC] Small compiler speedup?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [RFC] Small compiler speedup?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [RFC] Small compiler speedup?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- [PATCH] Small compiler speedup
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [PATCH] Small compiler speedup
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [PATCH] Small compiler speedup
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]