This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fix opt/8634

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:05:51 -0700
Subject: Re: fix opt/8634
References: <20030407214230.GN9659@redhat.com> <20030407225503.GA27119@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 12:55:03AM +0200, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> why not? Is this time critical? Unless it is, I believe a bit slower
> but easier to understand solution should be preferable.

Are we to ignore the multitude of complaints concerning increasing
compile times?  The double walk is just gratuitous, and is easily
avoided.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fix opt/8634
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

References:
- fix opt/8634
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: fix opt/8634
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]