This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

review process (was: C++ PATCH: Unify name lookup 2/n)


On 30-Mar-2003, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com> wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>:
> > However, a point remains: We need a better process than we currently has.
> 
> I'm not going to disagree; process can always be improved.

Here are some possible suggestions (I'm just brain-storming here):

	- appoint more C++ maintainers (e.g. would it be appropriate
	  to make Gabriel Dos Reis a maintainer for the C++ front-end)?

	- define a new category of "self-approve" developers?
	  These developers would be permitted to approve their own patches
	  in particular areas.  This could be qualified further, e.g. by
	  requiring that the patch be reviewed by at least one
	  other person (though the other person need not be
	  an official maintainer), and/or that the patch not be
	  committed until a week after it had been posted to gcc-patches.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]