This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- To: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, jbuck at synopsys dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rmathew at hotmail dot com
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 16:16:09 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
- References: <20030206094122.A24518@synopsys.com> <b1ugg0$7ic$1@main.gmane.org> <200302062046.PAA16379@caip.rutgers.edu> <m3u1fglbu8.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <200302111612.LAA09514@caip.rutgers.edu> <200302121538.KAA04422@caip.rutgers.edu> <200303050513.AAA13912@caip.rutgers.edu> <200303172319.SAA03198@caip.rutgers.edu> <m3hea1y2ab.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20030318090656.B22708@synopsys.com>
> From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 12:57:32AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu> writes:
> >
> > | Gaby,
> > |
> > | I heard back from Joe that this patch cures the solaris2 java failures
> > | which occurred with a recent version of gas. I've verified the native
> > | as/ld case has no regressions.
> > |
> > | Ok for 3.2.x?
> >
> > Sure!
> >
> > Thanks to both of you.
>
> Is there a PR for this issue?
Not that I'm aware of, i.e. I didn't file one. (I heard about the
issue directly from you, not the GNATS database.)
If you're asking WRT the next release notes and want to increase our
fixed-PR count, open a PR and immediately close it. ;-)
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu