This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [committed as obvious] GNU CC -> GCC in f/


On 13 Mar 2003, Kai Henningsen wrote:

> neroden at twcny dot rr dot com (Nathanael Nerode)  wrote on 12.03.03 in <20030313023533 dot GA4137 at doctormoo>:
> 
> >  The packaging and compiler portions of GNU Fortran are based largely
> > -on the GNU CC compiler.
> > +on the GCC compiler.
> 
> >  @xref{G++ and GCC,,Compile C; C++; Objective-C; Ada; Fortran;
> >  or Java,gcc,Using the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC)},
> >  for information on the way different languages are handled
> > -by the GNU CC compiler (@command{gcc}).
> > +by the GCC compiler (@command{gcc}).
> 
> (perhaps more)
> 
> "The GNU compiler collection compiler"?
> 
> That sounds wrong.

The problem here is that parts of the Fortran manual need a rewrite to 
change emphasis, not a search-and-replace.  The present wording has 
emphasis appropriate for the days when g77 was distributed with a large 
patch to back end and common code that had to be applied to a particular 
gcc (C/C++/ObjC) release, so it describes g77 as being based on the C 
compiler.  The appropriate emphasis is that g77 is one of many front ends 
and is a _part_ of GCC (not based on it).  Similarly, the claim that a GNU 
Fortran installation includes a modified gcc command is wrong - there is 
no such thing as a GNU Fortran installation, just a GCC installation that 
may include various subsets of the front ends.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]