This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: SSE/MMX moves optimization

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 12:59:09 +0100
Subject: Re: SSE/MMX moves optimization
References: <20030204194506.GG8259@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <200303071851.10379.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20030307223029.GC7871@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <200303080048.53414.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

> > > Why this circular permutation of constraints for operand 1?
> >
> > This is to match the order used by the other patterns so we have them in
> > sync.
> 
> And you don't need to do the same permutation for operand 0?

I don't think so - I just get different combinations.  I will double
check the patch.

Honza
> 
> -- 
> Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SSE/MMX moves optimization
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: SSE/MMX moves optimization
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: SSE/MMX moves optimization
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: SSE/MMX moves optimization
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]