This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ PATCH for 3.4, committed] Fix PR9188
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <lerdsuwa at users dot sourceforge dot net>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:31:29 -0500
- Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH for 3.4, committed] Fix PR9188
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0303061916550.9756-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:19:26 +0000 (GMT), "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk> wrote:
> Why haven't you added a testcase for this? Patches need either
> testcases, or justification for their absence (especially in cases like
> this where it looks like a testcase ought to be easy, using dg-bogus
> "expected expected").
Frankly, I don't think this bug is worth spending the CPU cycles to test for.
Jason