This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
Cc: aoliva at redhat dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:42:18 -0800
Subject: Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer
References: <3100000.1046652025@localhost> <200303031902.h23J2KC02152@desire.geoffk.org> <orvfz0w8io.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <200303031946.h23JkI102188@desire.geoffk.org> <orisv0w6ra.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <200303032041.h23KfQN02246@desire.geoffk.org>

On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:41:26PM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote:
> - sparc-elf (R_SPARC_64)

This is not one of them.  R_SPARC_64 is a sparc64 relocation.
But sparc-elf is 32-bit only, and sparc64 has no ilp32 mode,
so the question is moot.



r~

References:
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a validinitializer
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a validinitializer
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer
  - From: Geoff Keating

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]