This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>,rth at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 08:27:07 +0000
Subject: Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer
References: <orznogn7qt.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <jmk7fkvyu5.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> <1046482583.4831.206.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <jmfzq7x2xo.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> <jmbs0vx1bo.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> <1046490383.5171.215.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell wrote:-

> Having done the research, would you put some of that in a comment in the
> test-case?  That will save people having to go back to grep around in
> the lists if they run into this again.

Hear hear.  A depressingly large number of testcases go in without a
single comment.  IMO every testcase should contain a comment.

Neil.

References:
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a validinitializer
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a valid initializer
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: don't assume pointer cast to unsigned long is a validinitializer
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]