This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/9262

"Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr> writes:

> I also posted a patch for another minor regression some time ago:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00888.html
>
> Would you be so kind as to review it too? Thanks in advance.

Eh.  I think I'd rather you did the split the other way around:
create a flag_inlining_on_rtl which is frobbed by the front ends that
want tree inlining, and leave flag_inline_functions named what it is
right now.

Also, does this effect mean that the front ends that use tree inlining
ignore -finline-functions?  If so, should we change that?

zw
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]