This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
- From: Dan Kegel <dkegel at ixiacom dot com>
- To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:04:58 -0800
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
- References: <200302232354.SAA19348@caip.rutgers.edu>
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
<h3>Applications</h3>
<p>It is important that the compiler is verified on real-world
applications. The following applications represent a mix of low-level
and high-level code, of numerical and logical programs, and of
different programming languages.</p>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html">ACE</a></td>
<td>C++</td>
<td>5.2</td>
<td><a href="http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html">
ACE (download)</a></td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
...
Can we add Samba to the list? It is quite widely used, and 3.2.2
currently has a Samba regression at -O2 on Sparc that has
caused some public wailing and gnashing of teeth. See bug 8726
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8726
If you agree, here's HTML that might do:
<tr><td><a href="http://www.samba.org">Samba</a></td>
<td>C</td>
<td>2.2.7a</td>
<td><a href="http://us2.samba.org/samba/download.html">Samba (download)</a></td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
Thanks,
Dan
(not subscribed)