This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR c/8068
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Geert Bosch <bosch at gnat dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>, Arend Bayer <arend dot bayer at web dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Michal Ludvig <mludvig at suse dot cz>
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 22:15:28 -0800
- Subject: Re: PR c/8068
- References: <20030222201941.GA30293@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <C991F438-46EB-11D7-9764-00039344BF4A@gnat.com>
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:00:54AM -0500, Geert Bosch wrote:
> On Saturday, Feb 22, 2003, at 15:19 America/New_York, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >Hmm, theoretically we can use stabs for debug and dwarf2 for unwind,
> >I am not quite sure ada will deal with it.
> >Even without unwind info it is probably the best we can get.
> It should work fine.
No, it won't. Stabs doesn't really work on any 64-bit platform.
Yes, Solaris tries to use it, but gdb's behaviour with that is
less than stellar. Which makes sense since the address field in
the debug info is still 32-bits wide.