This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bugs in sysroot patches resulting in $(local_include)/include always searched, ../-expansion broken

> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 22:55:55 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 03:05:27AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > I can confirm that it works as expected.  Thanks!  Do you have a
> > patch for the second problem?
> No, but it should be a matter of an -isystem somewhere.

I changed my setup instead.

> > ...hum, maybe I should fix my setup to not require relocation.
> > I'll do that, but I'm still uneasy about the changed relocation
> > semantics (not relocating when the gcc binary is elsewhere).
> > Was that discussed and agreed on?
> I don't understand what change you mean.

Look at previous emails, same thread.  You changed
implementation semantics so that calling gcc from outside the
installation prefix, for example as /foo/build/gcc/xgcc, now
results in include-paths at it's configured --prefix will not
get ../-relocated.  You said it was a matter of correctness.
I'm not so sure, therefore I ask if that change was really
agreed to by the approver.

brgds, H-P

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]