This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] to java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <ronald at landheer dot com>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:13:26 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] to java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302141540020.17397-200000@localhost.localdomain><87n0kyrfi6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Ronald" == Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <ronald@landheer.com> writes:
 > 
 > Ronald> I have attached a (very, very) small patch to
 > Ronald> libjava/java/lang/natPosixProcess.cc which fixes a bug -
 > Ronald> kill() is called from java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy
 > Ronald> even when no signals are available. This will make the
 > Ronald> compilation fail if there are no signals.
 > 
 > What defines NO_SIGNALS?  And when?

natPosixProcess is for POSIX, right?  Without signals?

Andrew.

References:
- [PATCH] to java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy
  - From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
- Re: [PATCH] to java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]