Re: test patch for computed gotos

[Brad Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>]

BTW, I built and regression-checked only the C compiler with your gcse patches,
and there were some changes in the test results compared with the baseline of

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-02/msg00643.html

Brad

                === gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c,  -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c,  -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c,  -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c,  -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c,  -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/duff-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c unsigned long long int char (test for errors, line 929)
FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c unsigned long long int short (test for errors, line 930)
FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c unsigned long long int int (test for errors, line 931)FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c unsigned long long int long (test for errors, line 932)
FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c unsigned long long int float (test for errors, line 933)
FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c unsigned long long int double (test for errors, line 934)
FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c unsigned long long int signed (test for errors, line 935)
FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c unsigned long long int unsigned (test for errors, line 936)
FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c unsigned long long int _Bool (test for errors, line 937)
FAIL: gcc.dg/typespec-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/inline-1.c (test for excess errors)

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            21650
# of unexpected failures        18
# of expected failures          73
# of untested testcases         1
# of unsupported tests          170
/export/home/lucier/programs/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc version 3.4 20030212 (experimental)