This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH to cp/decl.c: Timing name lookup

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu, zack at codesourcery dot com
Date: 14 Feb 2003 03:11:17 +0100
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH to cp/decl.c: Timing name lookup
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <wvln0kzg9sr.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.33.0302132314260.30580-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk><20030213233550.GA29994@daikokuya.co.uk>

Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> writes:

| Joseph S. Myers wrote:-
| 
| > On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Jason Merrill wrote:
| > 
| > > It's not spurious.  (0,0) is not a valid null pointer constant; an integral
| > > constant-expression may not contain a comma operator.
| > 
| > And we ought to get rid of GCC's C extensions that allow such things 
| > without -pedantic.
| 
| Can't we get rid of them altogether, unless there's a good reason for
| having them (like your offsetof example)?  Otherwise, it just seems like
| having useless features for the sake of it.

I have the vague impression of knowing this music :-) :-)

-- Gaby

References:
- Re: C++ PATCH to cp/decl.c: Timing name lookup
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH to cp/decl.c: Timing name lookup
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: C++ PATCH to cp/decl.c: Timing name lookup
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]