This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH to cp/decl.c: Timing name lookup
Joseph S. Myers wrote:-
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > It's not spurious. (0,0) is not a valid null pointer constant; an integral
> > constant-expression may not contain a comma operator.
> And we ought to get rid of GCC's C extensions that allow such things
> without -pedantic.
Can't we get rid of them altogether, unless there's a good reason for
having them (like your offsetof example)? Otherwise, it just seems like
having useless features for the sake of it.