This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics


    I believe this generalization is drifting away from the initial
    specific topic.

Sure, but for what I consider a good reason: if we're going to treat
*certain* undefined behavior differently than others we need to:

(1) Be explicit that we are doing that; and
(2) Precisely characterize which behaviors are in each set.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]