This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics


    I completely disagree, and so do GCC's patch reviewers.  The behaviour
    of a program with optimization should always be the same as its behaviour
    without optimization.

Only for correct programs.

Are you really claiming that a program with an uninitialized variable
must be compiled in such a way that it produces the same result independent
of optimization?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]