This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A congerie of small performance patches
- From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl at vitelus dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mstump at apple dot com>
- Cc: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>,Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:24:46 -0800
- Subject: Re: A congerie of small performance patches
- References: <20030213005303.GI1479@vitelus.com> <85A40527-3EF3-11D7-AFC7-003065A77310@apple.com>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 05:36:07PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 04:53 PM, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 01:46:18PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> >>On an 8 processor machine, we want the time to build one file to be
> >
> >Why not just use, say make -j 16?
>
> Because it would have no effect on the compilation of a single file!
Yeah, I'm just trying to understand why the compilation time for a
single file matters.