This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: flag to dump core on error
Phil Edwards <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:10:39PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 03:23:26PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:15:35AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > > >
> > > > :-) Too cute for me to understand. I would have prefered averbose flags.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I think -d is getting overloaded here. There's a difference between
> > > "dump" as in "dump rtl pass number 17" (most -d flags) and "dump" as in
> > > "coredump".
> > >
> > > It's a really good idea, though. Thanks for adding this.
> > Maybe we need to start using --long-options for dump flags?
> Past time, I believe. Don't we already have some flags using an -fdump-*
> naming pattern? (Since, of course, --FOO is already translated to -fFOO.)
I'd welcome any patch along these lines. I for one can never remember
if I want to use -dp or -dA.
- Geoffrey Keating <email@example.com>