This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: flag to dump core on error


Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:10:39PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 03:23:26PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:15:35AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > :-)  Too cute for me to understand.  I would have prefered averbose flags.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, I think -d is getting overloaded here.  There's a difference between
> > > "dump" as in "dump rtl pass number 17" (most -d flags) and "dump" as in
> > > "coredump".
> > > 
> > > It's a really good idea, though.  Thanks for adding this.
> > 
> > Maybe we need to start using --long-options for dump flags?
> 
> Past time, I believe.  Don't we already have some flags using an -fdump-*
> naming pattern?  (Since, of course, --FOO is already translated to -fFOO.)

I'd welcome any patch along these lines.  I for one can never remember
if I want to use -dp or -dA.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]