This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: *ping* generic atomicity.h
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Danny Smith <danny_r_smith_2001 at yahoo dot co dot nz>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:11:07 -0500
- Subject: Re: *ping* generic atomicity.h
- References: <20030212085023.14793.qmail@web21414.mail.yahoo.com> <20030212124828.034f1dde.bkoz@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:48:28PM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> >Without either your patch or always using the i486 version of atomicity.h (as
> >per the submission at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-12/msg00232.html)
> >I cannot build libstdc++ for i386-pc-mingw with trunk or 3.3
> >
> >With the patch I can build i386-pc-cygwin (which has _GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT) and
> >i386-pc-mingw (which doesn't).
>
> Phil's call, either look ok from where I sit.
I'm hoping mine will also help the ARM situation. I'll apply it to trunk,
and later 3.3., um, sometime soon...
My devel box -- also the autocrasher box, and the regression-search-by-mail
box, and the www.devphil.com box, FWIW -- has been in pieces for a couple
days, awaiting some hardware TLC in the form of replacement memory. (And a
quieter cyclone fan, gah, I'm going deaf.) Maybe I'll figure out a backup
scheme, too.
Anyhow, sometime in the next 12 hours.
Phil
--
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
- Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002