This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Separate jump bypassing pass
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at www dot eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:51:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Separate jump bypassing pass
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301151129380.11411-100000@www.eyesopen.com>
>
>
> The following patch splits our current GCSE, so that the optimizations
> that significantly modify a function's control flow graph are performed
> after GCC's loop optimizations.
>
> The motivation for this patch and SPECcpu2000 timings were presented
> in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-09/msg01129.html back in September.
> The patch below is "New Bypass" as described in that post. I had
> originally intended to post it for review shortly afterwards, but
> Mark Mitchell requested that we concentrate fixing bugs in 3.2.1
> and the 3.3 branch before I got around to it.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-09/msg01157.html
>
> This patch provides significant performance advantages on
> SPECfp2000, but primarily it allows more aggressive forms of
> GCSE without adversely affecting performance by confusing GCC's
> loop optimizations with irreducible CFGs or misplaced loop notes.
>
>
> The following patch has been tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu by a full
> bootstrap, all languages except Ada and treelang, and a complete
> "make -k check" with no new regressions.
>
> Ok for mainline?
Roger,
thanks for the jump bypassing! It helps to the performance more than
I've expected :)
I think you should write also something to gcc-3.3/changes.html and
news, so we manifestate some activity to outside world.
Honza