This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch] Document pitfalls of two-stage name lookup, next revision
Gabriel Dos Reis <email@example.com> writes:
> Just ditch the footnote and use the standard terminology ("dependent
> name") in the main course of the document.
I agree with Wolfgang that "dependent name" is going to be confusing
to many of the target audience (including me ;) without a footnote
explaining the term. It may be the accepted terminology, but I'm
sure I'm not the only one who'd wonder "dependent on what?".