This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 12:54 PM, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Then you'll want to remove the Apple local code that bumps it up automatically, then turn it loose on the community, and see if people like the result. I think I know the answer. I think the answer is, it is just way too low on darwin.It's too low for some highly atypical test cases, but in real programs the limit is not a problem.I'm of two minds here. On the one hand, honoring the user's limits is a good thing; on the other hand, we know that the default stack limit is too low for us on Darwin and it seems to me that we ought not to make the user worry about that.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |