This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc/gcc/cp ChangeLog dump.c


On Jan 24, 2003, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:

> | in which case the boolification change has *nothing* to
> | do with ANSIfication?  I'm confused by what you're saying.

> I believe there is a fundamental misunderstanding here.  The exercise
> of converting the sources isn't to have you or others to act like
> kr2ansi. 

Still, I agree with Nathan that removing PARAMS is a no-brainer
change, akin to fixing typos in comments or adjusting indentation,
that can go in without explicit approval or careful reviews, whereas
modifying the return type of functions does require additional review
and, being an unrelated change, should better be done as a separate
patch, at the very least, to make sure that the functional change
doesn't get lost in the noise.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]