This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: updated patch for implicit libcall generation

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:23:55 -0800
Subject: Re: updated patch for implicit libcall generation
References: <20030124201559.GB25074@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0301242115580.7707-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:18:15PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> The default should be true (with most systems then having it specified to
> false in their target headers).  It should be for systems with antiquated
> libraries to say so, not systems with libraries following the current
> standard to say so; a default of false will be just as clearly the wrong
> way round in future as that of TARGET_MEM_FUNCTIONS is now.

Hum.  I guess I can see that.  But that does mean that Jan
needs to modify all the target headers so that the actual
setting for the systems is correct now.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: updated patch for implicit libcall generation
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: updated patch for implicit libcall generation
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: updated patch for implicit libcall generation
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]