This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libiberty: hashtab allocation functions with an extra argument

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:54:47PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > We still need alternate allocation functions and more space in the
> > htab, because we have to pass in the actual extra argument somehow.
> 
> More space in the htab for the pointer, yes.  I'm trying to avoid more
> space just for alternate alloc/free functions.  GCC is already having
> growing pains from structure creep.

OK.  I can kill the extra functions without having to play games with
first argument / last argument; we can just cast them when we use them. 
Is that OK, or do you want to see if anyone knows about the extra last
argument?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]