This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix SPEC2000 GCC misscopilation and SIMD support

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:36:15 -0800
Subject: Re: Fix SPEC2000 GCC misscopilation and SIMD support
References: <20021209194332.GA27696@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021209121352.A31284@redhat.com> <20021209202109.GA8787@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20021209205456.GA10339@redhat.com> <20021209213114.GM29204@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:31:14PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> The problem is that we split into such sequences post-reload
> and register_operand tests for corectness of subreg so the instructions
> fail to match.

Well _that_ we can fix.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fix SPEC2000 GCC misscopilation and SIMD support
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Fix SPEC2000 GCC misscopilation and SIMD support
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Fix SPEC2000 GCC misscopilation and SIMD support
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Fix SPEC2000 GCC misscopilation and SIMD support
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Fix SPEC2000 GCC misscopilation and SIMD support
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Fix SPEC2000 GCC misscopilation and SIMD support
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]