This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: rs6000 PPC32 SVR4 ABI long double function return bug

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 11:05:39 -0800
Subject: Re: rs6000 PPC32 SVR4 ABI long double function return bug
References: <m3y973asdr.fsf@frogsleap.quesejoda.com> <200212061855.NAA29832@makai.watson.ibm.com>

On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:55:02PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Aldy Hernandez writes:
> 
> Aldy> I am willing to set long doubles to 128 bits on the FSF tree as well
> Aldy> if y'all think this is a good idea.
> 
> 	If you want to set long double to 128 bit for SPE only, that's up
> to you.  As you explained, none of the support functions are provided and

I'm more inclined to leave things as is, mainly because I think
disabling long doubles is stupid, and because I hate to see hundreds
of gcc.c-torture failures.

It's up to Jim and you whether his patch should be applied though.

Aldy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rs6000 PPC32 SVR4 ABI long double function return bug
  - From: Fergus Henderson

References:
- Re: rs6000 PPC32 SVR4 ABI long double function return bug
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: rs6000 PPC32 SVR4 ABI long double function return bug
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]