This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] empty_stmt_nodes, deleted statements, iterators, and gsi_step_bb
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>,gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:04:47 -0500
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] empty_stmt_nodes, deleted statements, iterators, and gsi_step_bb
On Friday, November 29, 2002, at 12:50 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Andrew Macleod wrote:
So why does the builder do this? why doesn't it do something such as
link a compound statement into the tree, hang an empty_stmt node off
it,
and then point to that?
Because the CFG builder is not particularly bright. Your
suggestion sounds good to me. Care to implement it? :)
You have to hang two, no?
:)