This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] empty_stmt_nodes, deleted statements, iterators, and gsi_step_bb


On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Andrew Macleod wrote:

> So why does the builder do this? why doesn't it do something such as
> link a compound statement into the tree, hang an empty_stmt node off it,
> and then point to that?
> 
Because the CFG builder is not particularly bright.  Your
suggestion sounds good to me.  Care to implement it?  :)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]