This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What's the right way to do host libraries required for gcc
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: dberlin at dberlin dot org
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:03:32 -0500
- Subject: Re: What's the right way to do host libraries required for gcc
- References: <326D738E-F736-11D6-A8FE-000393575BCC@dberlin.org>
> Is there any better way to do this?
I can't think of a better way at the moment, but perhaps after the
toplevel is autoconfiscated you could add some code there to detect a
buildable or installed libbanshee, and pass a --with-banshee= flag to
gcc's configure accordingly.
A long-term idea would be to make configuring host subdirs part of the
toplevel makefile (much like target configs are), so we could have
configure-gcc depend on build-libbanshee. Then it would even handle
banshee build errors gracefully ;-)