This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Simplify floating point conversions II
> Jan Hubicka <email@example.com> writes:
> | > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 06:54:41PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> | > > + For fast math it would be safe probably to convert (float)sqrt(x)
> | > > + into sqrt((float)x), but in strict mode the argument can overflow. */
> | >
> | > I don't believe this to be true.
> | What you don't believe?
> Likew RTH, I, skeptical that your assertion is right.
> | That in ffast-math we can do the transformation?
> Do we really need to do that transformation? That is is there any
> real evidence that it brings any real benefit?
> I would be reluctant to include it even in -funsafe-math.
I am not implementing that transformation, so I am not sure.
Doing the cases I do right now and I believe to be safe brings quite
considerable amount of matches in standard C 3d graphics code that does
a lot of float and some casts to double coming from implicit C stuff.
> -- Gaby