This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Support for spec predicate expressions

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: drow at mvista dot com
Cc: thorpej at wasabisystems dot com, zack at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:05:22 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Support for spec predicate expressions
References: <20021028120858.E19682@dhcp7.wlan.shagadelic.org> <200210282034.g9SKYdU20886@greed.delorie.com> <20021030084841.F24032@dhcp7.wlan.shagadelic.org> <20021030173603.GA1503@codesourcery.com> <20021031133340.A24032@dhcp7.wlan.shagadelic.org> <200210312145.g9VLjII02223@greed.delorie.com> <20021031215209.GA29116@nevyn.them.org>

>  - Your caveat about code in <target>.c is a good one; this could be
> fixed with a target-specific object file to link into xgcc.  Easy
> enough; does it cause any new problems?  This will damage -b/-V more,
> possibly.

It will confuse gcc's -b option.  OTOH, we already have that problem.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Support for spec predicate expressions
  - From: Geoff Keating

References:
- [PATCH/RFC] Support for spec predicate expressions
  - From: Jason R Thorpe
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Support for spec predicate expressions
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Support for spec predicate expressions
  - From: Jason R Thorpe
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Support for spec predicate expressions
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Support for spec predicate expressions
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]