This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Set proper defaults for i386 on x86-64 compiler

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>,Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:19:22 +0100
Subject: Re: Set proper defaults for i386 on x86-64 compiler
References: <20021030221135.GB3485@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021031022621.V10988@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20021031075740.GB25429@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021031164451.GB4764@redhat.com> <20021031171421.GB30038@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20021031171715.GK4764@redhat.com>

> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:14:21PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > I am testing this version and will commit shortly.
> > I found another place where we are bit inconsistent about this.
> 
> Thanks.
Would be the patch OK for 3.2 branch too?  Thinking about it, this can
be quite serious if some Hammer distro based on 3.2 comes out.

Honza
> 
> 
> 
> r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Set proper defaults for i386 on x86-64 compiler
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Set proper defaults for i386 on x86-64 compiler
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Set proper defaults for i386 on x86-64 compiler
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Set proper defaults for i386 on x86-64 compiler
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Set proper defaults for i386 on x86-64 compiler
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Set proper defaults for i386 on x86-64 compiler
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Set proper defaults for i386 on x86-64 compiler
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]