This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ICE on i386

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:18:42 -0500
Subject: Re: ICE on i386
References: <hoof9xqcmy.fsf@gee.suse.de> <20021018104257.GD6414@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021018174429.GE4529@redhat.com> <016e01c27c77$fff51740$ce4f24d5@fr>

On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:41:20AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> That's a little weird though, because force_operand is not used subsequently
> in the PLUS_EXPR case.
> 
> Would you not want to consider to simply discard null operands instead of
> calling simplify_binary_operation then general_operand or force_operand, in
> light of the recent buzz around compilation time performances ?

I guess you're right.

> The following patch:
[...]
> fixes both PR c/7411 (for which the call to simplify_binary_operation was
> added) and the current ICE (now PR opt/8334) ?

Applied.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ICE on i386
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: ICE on i386
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: ICE on i386
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ICE on i386
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]