This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Update COND_EXPR section of c-tree.texi

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 16:53:13 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update COND_EXPR section of c-tree.texi
Organization: Codesourcery LLC
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210171217300.17590-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <20021018210832.GA4964@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:

Is this really necessary?  As a front-end thing, maybe, but it
would seem that the best way to handle this is to use

	(i >= 0 ? i : (abort(), 0))

FE's must canonicalize 'cond ?: false' after all ...

nathan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Update COND_EXPR section of c-tree.texi
  - From: Roger Sayle

References:
- [PATCH] Update COND_EXPR section of c-tree.texi
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [PATCH] Update COND_EXPR section of c-tree.texi
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]