This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Top level: Separate src release scripts from Makefile

From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
To: neroden at doctormoo dot dyndns dot org
Cc: ac131313 at redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 18:12:57 -0400
Subject: Re: Top level: Separate src release scripts from Makefile
References: <20020929165232.GA27545@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <3D9733C2.2010405@redhat.com> <20020929172608.GA27678@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <3D973C44.6090601@redhat.com> <20020929174544.GA30373@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <3D974828.4050009@redhat.com> <20020929190100.GA31652@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <3D9764F8.7000100@redhat.com> <20020929214623.GA9252@doctormoo.dyndns.org>

I'm thinking perhaps the release stuff should be in a package-specific
subdirectory?  Like the binutils release script should be in
src/binutils, and the gdb release script in src/gdb ?

And I also agree that src/Makefile.in should not itself be used to do
releases.  That's just icky.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Top level: Separate src release scripts from Makefile
  - From: Nathanael Nerode

References:
- top level: make more dependencies explicit
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Re: top level: make more dependencies explicit
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Re: top level: make more dependencies explicit
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: top level: make more dependencies explicit
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Re: top level: make more dependencies explicit
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Top level: Separate src release scripts from Makefile
  - From: Nathanael Nerode

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]