This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] MS Bitfields for Interix

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Douglas B Rupp <rupp at gnat dot com>
Cc: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:00:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MS Bitfields for Interix
References: <0b0801c254e8$97db9050$0500a8c0@Jinx> <jmheh49mby.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> <18c201c25880$1e097670$0500a8c0@Jinx> <200209110433.g8B4XSW13173@desire.geoffk.org> <021001c25a87$788c2350$0500a8c0@Jinx>

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:08:53AM -0700, Douglas B Rupp wrote:
> i386 seems to be critically short of target_flags bits, there's only one
> unused bit left (0x80000000),
> should I go ahead and use it?

No.  That's the sign bit, and it is not available for use.


r~

References:
- [PATCH] MS Bitfields for Interix
  - From: Douglas B Rupp
- Re: [PATCH] MS Bitfields for Interix
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: [PATCH] MS Bitfields for Interix
  - From: Douglas B Rupp
- Re: [PATCH] MS Bitfields for Interix
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: [PATCH] MS Bitfields for Interix
  - From: Douglas B Rupp

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]