This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: patch reversion request
- From: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "jason at redhat dot com" <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:02:02 -0700
- Subject: Re: patch reversion request
On Thursday, September 12, 2002, at 11:51 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
--On Thursday, September 12, 2002 07:43:08 PM +0100 Nathan Sidwell
<nathan@codesourcery.com> wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch breaks the following well formed C++,
void baz (const long &)
void foo (int a)
{
baz((long)a);
}
which is a regresion. see gnats prs 7828 & 7858
That seems a valid request; start your 48-hour clock, and then revert
at the end of that time as per our development policy.
I'll look into it. Obviously this code is fine, and, just as obviously,
there shouldn't be any problem with passing an rvalue to baz.
--Matt