This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH in Java constant propagation
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Sep 2002 13:51:51 -0600
- Subject: Re: PATCH in Java constant propagation
- References: <3D7F6CE8.7020900@bothner.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:
Per> I believe this fixes the bug that martin.kahlert@infineon.com
Per> reported (subject: Is this a bug?). I *think* it doesn't break
Per> anything else, but I did get a lot of testsuite errors, so I'm
Per> not sure. I looks like I will be inaccessible for a the rest of
Per> the week, so I'd appreciate it if someone could test it, and if
Per> it works, check it in.
I applied and tested this patch. I rebuilt libgcj from scratch with
it, and I ran the test suite including Mauve. I get just the ordinary
expected problems, and no regressions (against a compiler without the
patch -- some of the currently-expected failures seem to represent
regressions against earlier compilers).
I'm checking this in.
Tom