This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] New gcov format

From: fche at redhat dot com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"jh at suse dot cz" <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: 10 Sep 2002 10:24:43 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New gcov format
References: <3D7BCAAD.4020307@codesourcery.com><31140000.1031597037@warlock.codesourcery.com><20020910065508.GA18586@redhat.com><3D7DD7A0.7070004@codesourcery.com>

nathan wrote:

> [...]
> Ok, I'll not do that part of the patch. But I will add documentation to
> -ftest-coverage to say you'll need a static libgcc

Would this not imply that shared-library-based applications that would
otherwise benefit from (require?) shared libgcc could not be used
with -ftest-coverage?  If so, then perhaps the gcov runtime functions
should also be put into a new shared library.

- FChE

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] New gcov format
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

References:
- [PATCH] New gcov format
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH] New gcov format
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] New gcov format
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] New gcov format
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]