This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: typeof woes in symbol renaming, or glibc x gcc
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "jakub at redhat dot com" <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: 27 Aug 2002 16:13:54 -0300
- Subject: Re: typeof woes in symbol renaming, or glibc x gcc
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <25320000.1030474820@warlock.codesourcery.com>
On Aug 27, 2002, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>>> For the 3.2 branch too?
> If it's a regression, yes. Otherwise, no.
I don't think it is a regression, no. Unless `I was able to build an
earlier version of glibc with the symbol versioning feature enabled,
but this feature is not enabled in CVS glibc' count as a regression.
Does the fact that the upcoming glibc 2.3 won't be built properly
without this patch in GCC, so every GNU/Linux vendor that adopts GCC
3.2 and glibc 2.3 will probably install this patch themselves, help
get the patch accepted for 3.2.1?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer