This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libgcc2 versus x86_64 Ada
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, geert at gnat dot com
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:04:47 +0200
- Subject: Re: libgcc2 versus x86_64 Ada
- References: <20020826205130.V24875@chimera.suse.cz> <200208262055.QAA23530@makai.watson.ibm.com>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 04:55:36PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Why not just define MIN_UNITS_PER_WORD in i386.h based on
> IN_LIBGCC2 following the sparc.h precedent?
Hmm, that is also possible. I didn't noticed we do have IN_LIBGCC2.
Is that considered cleaner approach than the former?
(we do use the LIBGCC2_* macros for some other stuff and from some kind
it looks to me cleaner to not reuse same macro for two different purposes)
Honza
>
> David